https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469091 A dispute over second-hand Xerox-branded office equipment was settled on terms requiring importers and resellers to permanently affix prominent disclosures stating that the machines were used, not imported directly from Xerox or its affiliates, not serviced or maintained by them, sold as received without additions or removals, and not covered by any warranty. The same disclosure had to appear in publicity materials, manuals, advertising and other public communications. If any post-import changes were made, the Xerox mark had to be removed before further sale or use, and jobbers or photocopying shops were not to remove or obliterate the disclosure. The settlement was recorded, affidavits were to be filed, and the suit was disposed of in those terms without costs. en-us Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:25:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469091 A dispute over second-hand Xerox-branded office equipment was settled on terms requiring importers and resellers to permanently affix prominent disclosures stating that the machines were used, not imported directly from Xerox or its affiliates, not serviced or maintained by them, sold as received without additions or removals, and not covered by any warranty. The same disclosure had to appear in publicity materials, manuals, advertising and other public communications. If any post-import changes were made, the Xerox mark had to be removed before further sale or use, and jobbers or photocopying shops were not to remove or obliterate the disclosure. The settlement was recorded, affidavits were to be filed, and the suit was disposed of in those terms without costs. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469091