https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469089 Miscellaneous applications styled as requests for clarification and intervention were treated as an indirect attempt to reopen an earlier judgment through review-like relief. The Supreme Court held that such recourse amounted to an abuse of process because it sought to bypass the limits on review by using miscellaneous applications, and it noted the unnecessary consumption of judicial time caused by this growing practice. The applications were dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 11:07:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469089 Miscellaneous applications styled as requests for clarification and intervention were treated as an indirect attempt to reopen an earlier judgment through review-like relief. The Supreme Court held that such recourse amounted to an abuse of process because it sought to bypass the limits on review by using miscellaneous applications, and it noted the unnecessary consumption of judicial time caused by this growing practice. The applications were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469089