<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52019</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appellant&#039;s prayer for early hearing of their appeals, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and remanding the matter for de novo adjudication due to non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The impugned order was found to be in violation of the Tribunal&#039;s remand order and was consequently set aside, with the matter being remanded back to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:22:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 85 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52019</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appellant&#039;s prayer for early hearing of their appeals, setting aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and remanding the matter for de novo adjudication due to non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The impugned order was found to be in violation of the Tribunal&#039;s remand order and was consequently set aside, with the matter being remanded back to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>