<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 57 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792676</link>
    <description>Individual houses constructed within an approved layout with common facilities were treated as a &quot;residential complex&quot; because the statutory definition covers a complex of more than twelve residential units with common areas and prescribed amenities, and the Explanation extends &quot;residential unit&quot; to a single house or apartment. On limitation, the demand could not be sustained where an earlier favourable Tribunal view existed during the relevant period; mere non-registration, non-filing of returns and non-payment were insufficient to justify the extended period. As the show cause notice was issued after the normal limitation had expired, the demand failed and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 57 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792676</link>
      <description>Individual houses constructed within an approved layout with common facilities were treated as a &quot;residential complex&quot; because the statutory definition covers a complex of more than twelve residential units with common areas and prescribed amenities, and the Explanation extends &quot;residential unit&quot; to a single house or apartment. On limitation, the demand could not be sustained where an earlier favourable Tribunal view existed during the relevant period; mere non-registration, non-filing of returns and non-payment were insufficient to justify the extended period. As the show cause notice was issued after the normal limitation had expired, the demand failed and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>