<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 59 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792678</link>
    <description>Independent villas or houses built on separately identified plots under separate agreements do not, by themselves, constitute a residential complex for service tax purposes. The statutory definition under Section 65(91a) of the Finance Act, 1994 applies only where the cumulative requirements are met: more than twelve residential units, a common area, and specified facilities within premises whose layout is approved by the competent authority. A gated community, common project name, or shared amenities is not sufficient on its own. On the facts described, such construction was outside the residential complex category, so service tax could not be levied on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 59 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792678</link>
      <description>Independent villas or houses built on separately identified plots under separate agreements do not, by themselves, constitute a residential complex for service tax purposes. The statutory definition under Section 65(91a) of the Finance Act, 1994 applies only where the cumulative requirements are met: more than twelve residential units, a common area, and specified facilities within premises whose layout is approved by the competent authority. A gated community, common project name, or shared amenities is not sufficient on its own. On the facts described, such construction was outside the residential complex category, so service tax could not be levied on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>