<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 60 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792679</link>
    <description>Interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 applies when service tax is deposited after the prescribed due date, because the levy is compensatory and follows the delay itself. Administrative or bureaucratic constraints do not extinguish the statutory liability once tax has been withheld beyond time. The belated deposit was therefore liable to interest at the applicable rate, and the challenge to the levy was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 60 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792679</link>
      <description>Interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 applies when service tax is deposited after the prescribed due date, because the levy is compensatory and follows the delay itself. Administrative or bureaucratic constraints do not extinguish the statutory liability once tax has been withheld beyond time. The belated deposit was therefore liable to interest at the applicable rate, and the challenge to the levy was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>