<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 69 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792688</link>
    <description>In CIRP, a resolution professional may seek recovery of the corporate debtor&#039;s premises from an occupant who cannot show a valid lease, licence or other legally cognisable right. Unregistered and unstamped profit-sharing agreements did not create any interest or occupancy right in the hotel premises, especially where no supporting consideration appeared in the corporate debtor&#039;s books or bank records and the documents surfaced only after the eviction request. The appellate tribunal held that the application for vacation and handover of possession was maintainable and the eviction order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 69 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792688</link>
      <description>In CIRP, a resolution professional may seek recovery of the corporate debtor&#039;s premises from an occupant who cannot show a valid lease, licence or other legally cognisable right. Unregistered and unstamped profit-sharing agreements did not create any interest or occupancy right in the hotel premises, especially where no supporting consideration appeared in the corporate debtor&#039;s books or bank records and the documents surfaced only after the eviction request. The appellate tribunal held that the application for vacation and handover of possession was maintainable and the eviction order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>