<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 82 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the enhancement of duty demand and penalties in remand proceedings was unjustified, and the principle of natural justice was violated due to unavailable cross-examination of key witnesses. The Tribunal upheld the finding of clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods, adjusting the duty demand to Rs. 26,23,179/- and reducing the penalty on M/s. Vallabh Alloys to Rs. 10 lakhs. Interest was applicable from 28-9-96. Separate penalties on individual appellants were vacated as their involvement was limited to manufacturing. The appeals were resolved with revised duty demands and reduced penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 82 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the enhancement of duty demand and penalties in remand proceedings was unjustified, and the principle of natural justice was violated due to unavailable cross-examination of key witnesses. The Tribunal upheld the finding of clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods, adjusting the duty demand to Rs. 26,23,179/- and reducing the penalty on M/s. Vallabh Alloys to Rs. 10 lakhs. Interest was applicable from 28-9-96. Separate penalties on individual appellants were vacated as their involvement was limited to manufacturing. The appeals were resolved with revised duty demands and reduced penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>