<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 93 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792712</link>
    <description>A co-operative credit society dealing only with members was treated as entitled to deduction under the co-operative income-tax provision because its lending activity fell within member-only credit facilities and the provision was applied liberally in favour of the sector. Related interest income from deposits with banks and co-operative institutions was also treated as attributable to the society&#039;s business. Separately, a 126-day delay in filing the first appeal was found bona fide and unintentional, with the departure of the tax representative and time needed to assemble records accepted as sufficient cause; the refusal to condone delay was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 93 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792712</link>
      <description>A co-operative credit society dealing only with members was treated as entitled to deduction under the co-operative income-tax provision because its lending activity fell within member-only credit facilities and the provision was applied liberally in favour of the sector. Related interest income from deposits with banks and co-operative institutions was also treated as attributable to the society&#039;s business. Separately, a 126-day delay in filing the first appeal was found bona fide and unintentional, with the departure of the tax representative and time needed to assemble records accepted as sufficient cause; the refusal to condone delay was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>