https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52015 An application to restore an appeal filed more than five years after dismissal was rejected because no sufficient cause was shown for the delay. The applicants did not establish that they remained in contact with their advocate or took steps to verify the status of the appeal, and they also failed to notify the Tribunal of any change in address for correspondence. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the prolonged delay, the Tribunal found the explanation wholly unsatisfactory and declined restoration of the appeal. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:13:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52015 An application to restore an appeal filed more than five years after dismissal was rejected because no sufficient cause was shown for the delay. The applicants did not establish that they remained in contact with their advocate or took steps to verify the status of the appeal, and they also failed to notify the Tribunal of any change in address for correspondence. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the prolonged delay, the Tribunal found the explanation wholly unsatisfactory and declined restoration of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52015