https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792715 A review petition filed after a substantial unexplained delay and left defective despite notice was found not maintainable. The Court noted that the delay of 573 days was not satisfactorily explained, and the petitioner had not cured the defects in the review papers. On scrutiny of the impugned order and the accompanying material, no error apparent on the face of the record or other ground for review was established. The review was therefore rejected both on delay and on merits. en-us Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792715 A review petition filed after a substantial unexplained delay and left defective despite notice was found not maintainable. The Court noted that the delay of 573 days was not satisfactorily explained, and the petitioner had not cured the defects in the review papers. On scrutiny of the impugned order and the accompanying material, no error apparent on the face of the record or other ground for review was established. The review was therefore rejected both on delay and on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792715