https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792719 Non-supply of the grounds of arrest, absence of a clear endorsement that those grounds were served, and non-compliance with the DIN requirement in the arrest memo were treated as serious arrest-safeguard defects under the CGST Act. The remand magistrate also failed to examine the legality of service of the grounds of arrest and passed the remand order mechanically, without application of mind. On these findings, the detention was held unlawful, the remand order was quashed, and habeas corpus relief was granted with a direction to release the petitioner from custody, subject to liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2026 08:47:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792719 Non-supply of the grounds of arrest, absence of a clear endorsement that those grounds were served, and non-compliance with the DIN requirement in the arrest memo were treated as serious arrest-safeguard defects under the CGST Act. The remand magistrate also failed to examine the legality of service of the grounds of arrest and passed the remand order mechanically, without application of mind. On these findings, the detention was held unlawful, the remand order was quashed, and habeas corpus relief was granted with a direction to release the petitioner from custody, subject to liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792719