<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2290 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469056</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages recovered from vendors for breach of contract were treated as penalty for non-compliance, not as consideration for any activity undertaken for another person, so they were not taxable as a declared service by way of tolerating breach. The demand also failed on limitation because the assessee had filed ST-3 returns, records were available to departmental audit, and the material did not show wilful suppression or an intent to evade tax. The extended period was therefore unavailable, and the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 13:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2290 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469056</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages recovered from vendors for breach of contract were treated as penalty for non-compliance, not as consideration for any activity undertaken for another person, so they were not taxable as a declared service by way of tolerating breach. The demand also failed on limitation because the assessee had filed ST-3 returns, records were available to departmental audit, and the material did not show wilful suppression or an intent to evade tax. The extended period was therefore unavailable, and the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>