<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1673 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469061</link>
    <description>Where books of account are rejected and income is estimated, separate additions cannot be made again for sundry creditors, opening stock, cash deposits or alleged bogus purchases, because those items already form part of the rejected trading results. Isolating the same entries for further disallowance amounts to impermissible double addition on the same material. The Tribunal therefore upheld deletion of the impugned additions and sustained the view that no standalone addition was justified after estimation of business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1673 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469061</link>
      <description>Where books of account are rejected and income is estimated, separate additions cannot be made again for sundry creditors, opening stock, cash deposits or alleged bogus purchases, because those items already form part of the rejected trading results. Isolating the same entries for further disallowance amounts to impermissible double addition on the same material. The Tribunal therefore upheld deletion of the impugned additions and sustained the view that no standalone addition was justified after estimation of business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>