https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469055 A consent order recording a concession cannot be reopened in appeal where the appellant did not challenge the consent before the same court and did not plead or show lack of authority of the officer who appeared. The judicial record of the concession remained binding, and the merits could not be re-agitated behind the consent order. A deposit made only to secure stay of execution is not satisfaction of the decree; it may be released to the decree-holder while any balance remains executable. The consent-based decree was left undisturbed, the deposited amount was directed to be released, and costs were imposed against the appellant. en-us Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:03:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469055 A consent order recording a concession cannot be reopened in appeal where the appellant did not challenge the consent before the same court and did not plead or show lack of authority of the officer who appeared. The judicial record of the concession remained binding, and the merits could not be re-agitated behind the consent order. A deposit made only to secure stay of execution is not satisfaction of the decree; it may be released to the decree-holder while any balance remains executable. The consent-based decree was left undisturbed, the deposited amount was directed to be released, and costs were imposed against the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469055