<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 94 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand raised under Section 11A and emphasizing the use of the price of goods sold outside for determining the assessable value of goods consumed captively. The Tribunal found the assessments were validly reopened and rejected the argument against the sustainability of the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:05:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 94 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the demand raised under Section 11A and emphasizing the use of the price of goods sold outside for determining the assessable value of goods consumed captively. The Tribunal found the assessments were validly reopened and rejected the argument against the sustainability of the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>