<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52000</link>
    <description>Non-supply of relied upon documents and ineffective service of hearing notices vitiated the adjudication for breach of natural justice. The tribunal noted that mere permission to inspect documents was not enough when the appellants repeatedly sought copies for preparing their defence, and that hearing notices were not effectively received, including one delivered after the scheduled date. As the defence was never properly placed on record before the adjudicating authority, the order could not stand. The adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after supplying the relied upon documents and granting an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:03:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52000</link>
      <description>Non-supply of relied upon documents and ineffective service of hearing notices vitiated the adjudication for breach of natural justice. The tribunal noted that mere permission to inspect documents was not enough when the appellants repeatedly sought copies for preparing their defence, and that hearing notices were not effectively received, including one delivered after the scheduled date. As the defence was never properly placed on record before the adjudicating authority, the order could not stand. The adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after supplying the relied upon documents and granting an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>