<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Static vs Ambulatory DTAA Doctrine - Reliance Jio&#039;s April 2026 Vindication How ITAT Mumbai&#039;s Ruling on Voice Termination Services (ITA No. 2991/Mum/2023)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16542</link>
    <description>Cross-border telecommunication payments are analysed under the royalty, FTS, and business profits framework in light of a retrospective domestic amendment expanding the meaning of &quot;process&quot; in section 9(1)(vi). The article contrasts static and ambulatory treaty interpretation under article 3(2), noting that domestic amendments cannot unilaterally override pre-existing DTAA terms. It explains that, on the facts discussed, bandwidth and voice termination receipts fall outside royalty and FTS characterisation and are treated as business profits where no permanent establishment exists.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Static vs Ambulatory DTAA Doctrine - Reliance Jio&#039;s April 2026 Vindication How ITAT Mumbai&#039;s Ruling on Voice Termination Services (ITA No. 2991/Mum/2023)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16542</link>
      <description>Cross-border telecommunication payments are analysed under the royalty, FTS, and business profits framework in light of a retrospective domestic amendment expanding the meaning of &quot;process&quot; in section 9(1)(vi). The article contrasts static and ambulatory treaty interpretation under article 3(2), noting that domestic amendments cannot unilaterally override pre-existing DTAA terms. It explains that, on the facts discussed, bandwidth and voice termination receipts fall outside royalty and FTS characterisation and are treated as business profits where no permanent establishment exists.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:26:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>