<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 21 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792640</link>
    <description>Customs transaction value remains the primary basis of valuation and can be rejected only on legally admissible, corroborated evidence showing that the declared price is not the price actually paid or payable. Unsigned parallel invoices, uncorroborated overseas verification material, unauthenticated emails, insurance papers and retracted statements, without a money trail or additional consideration, are insufficient. Where rejection of value fails, re-determination, differential duty demand, confiscation and penalties cannot stand, including penalty on a co-appellant absent independent proof of abetment. The extended limitation period under the Customs Act also requires proof of suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 21 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792640</link>
      <description>Customs transaction value remains the primary basis of valuation and can be rejected only on legally admissible, corroborated evidence showing that the declared price is not the price actually paid or payable. Unsigned parallel invoices, uncorroborated overseas verification material, unauthenticated emails, insurance papers and retracted statements, without a money trail or additional consideration, are insufficient. Where rejection of value fails, re-determination, differential duty demand, confiscation and penalties cannot stand, including penalty on a co-appellant absent independent proof of abetment. The extended limitation period under the Customs Act also requires proof of suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>