<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792671</link>
    <description>General penalty under Section 125 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act cannot be imposed for delayed filing of annual returns where late fee is the statutory consequence and no independent penalty applies. The general penalty was therefore deleted, while the late fee liability remained payable within the stipulated period. The applicable late-fee framework, including the stated cap for the relevant class of cases, was recognised, but did not justify an additional general penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792671</link>
      <description>General penalty under Section 125 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act cannot be imposed for delayed filing of annual returns where late fee is the statutory consequence and no independent penalty applies. The general penalty was therefore deleted, while the late fee liability remained payable within the stipulated period. The applicable late-fee framework, including the stated cap for the relevant class of cases, was recognised, but did not justify an additional general penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>