<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792674</link>
    <description>Detention notice and detention order were held unsustainable where the transportation documents were available at the time of interception. On the materials produced, the detention was found to have been made for extraneous reasons, so the writ petition under Article 226 was allowed and the impugned notice and order were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief directed to follow forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792674</link>
      <description>Detention notice and detention order were held unsustainable where the transportation documents were available at the time of interception. On the materials produced, the detention was found to have been made for extraneous reasons, so the writ petition under Article 226 was allowed and the impugned notice and order were quashed and set aside, with consequential relief directed to follow forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>