<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 69 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that for availing the benefit of Notification No. 45/94-Cus, it is sufficient that goods are capable of being used in the industry, not necessarily actually used. As the goods were found capable of being used in the leather industry, the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the notification. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 69 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that for availing the benefit of Notification No. 45/94-Cus, it is sufficient that goods are capable of being used in the industry, not necessarily actually used. As the goods were found capable of being used in the leather industry, the appellants were entitled to the benefit of the notification. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>