<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 92 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the appellants&#039; appeal for a refund of excess duty paid on Electro Static Precipitators. It determined that the doctrine of unjust enrichment was inapplicable, as the duty was not transferred to customers, with the goods used for captive consumption in a power plant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 92 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the appellants&#039; appeal for a refund of excess duty paid on Electro Static Precipitators. It determined that the doctrine of unjust enrichment was inapplicable, as the duty was not transferred to customers, with the goods used for captive consumption in a power plant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>