<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bank loan compromise with DRT approval can justify quashing criminal prosecution as an abuse of process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100311</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution for cheating and use of forged documents arising from a bank loan transaction was quashed because the dispute had a predominantly civil and commercial character. The loan account had been fully settled under a compromise approved by the Bank, placed before and acted upon by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and followed by a no dues certificate and withdrawal of recovery proceedings. The later complaint was treated as an afterthought, and the Court held that continuation of the prosecution would be oppressive, yield a remote and bleak prospect of conviction, and amount to an abuse of process. The chargesheet and order framing charges were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bank loan compromise with DRT approval can justify quashing criminal prosecution as an abuse of process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100311</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution for cheating and use of forged documents arising from a bank loan transaction was quashed because the dispute had a predominantly civil and commercial character. The loan account had been fully settled under a compromise approved by the Bank, placed before and acted upon by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and followed by a no dues certificate and withdrawal of recovery proceedings. The later complaint was treated as an afterthought, and the Court held that continuation of the prosecution would be oppressive, yield a remote and bleak prospect of conviction, and amount to an abuse of process. The chargesheet and order framing charges were quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>