<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 178 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51990</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata dismissed a Miscellaneous Application seeking to condone a 454-day delay in filing an appeal contesting the confiscation of a truck. The delay was not excused based on another appellant filing an appeal. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 178 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51990</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata dismissed a Miscellaneous Application seeking to condone a 454-day delay in filing an appeal contesting the confiscation of a truck. The delay was not excused based on another appellant filing an appeal. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>