https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51987 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and the demand for redemption fine due to an untimely show cause notice. The duty demand was upheld, but the interest demand was dismissed. The enforcement of Bank Guarantees by the Commissioner of Customs was upheld. BIFR consent was deemed unnecessary for proceedings, but the confiscation order remained invalid. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51987 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods and the demand for redemption fine due to an untimely show cause notice. The duty demand was upheld, but the interest demand was dismissed. The enforcement of Bank Guarantees by the Commissioner of Customs was upheld. BIFR consent was deemed unnecessary for proceedings, but the confiscation order remained invalid. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51987