<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1510 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469029</link>
    <description>In bail matters involving alleged murder and criminal conspiracy, the Court stated that the nature of the accusation, the gravity of the offence, prima facie evidence, and the risk of the accused influencing the process of justice are material considerations. It found the bail order unsustainable because the High Court did not consider the investigation material and gave no germane reasons. The Court also noted that the prosecution case being based on circumstantial evidence did not, by itself, justify bail where the investigation allegedly disclosed a complete chain linking the accused to the offence. General observations about local roots and no apprehension of absconding were held insufficient in such serious offences, and the bail order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 13:03:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1510 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469029</link>
      <description>In bail matters involving alleged murder and criminal conspiracy, the Court stated that the nature of the accusation, the gravity of the offence, prima facie evidence, and the risk of the accused influencing the process of justice are material considerations. It found the bail order unsustainable because the High Court did not consider the investigation material and gave no germane reasons. The Court also noted that the prosecution case being based on circumstantial evidence did not, by itself, justify bail where the investigation allegedly disclosed a complete chain linking the accused to the offence. General observations about local roots and no apprehension of absconding were held insufficient in such serious offences, and the bail order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>