<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>India&#039;s MAP Crisis - 68 Months, 1,400 Pending Cases, and a New Act That Changes Nothing How Section 533 of the Income-Tax Act, 2025 Fails to Cure India&#039;s Mutual Agreement Procedure Backlog</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16540</link>
    <description>Mutual Agreement Procedure under the Income-tax Act, 2025 remains the treaty mechanism for resolving taxation not in accordance with a double taxation avoidance agreement, but Section 533 largely reproduces the earlier framework without curing India&#039;s prolonged MAP backlog. Rule 121 and Form 55 improve the application stage through more structured disclosures, yet they do not address the negotiation bottleneck, under-resourced administration, lack of mandatory arbitration, parallel domestic appeal proceedings, or limited transparency. The article proposes targeted reforms including a 24-month resolution timeline, MAP-appeal coordination, specialist resourcing, and public statistics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>India&#039;s MAP Crisis - 68 Months, 1,400 Pending Cases, and a New Act That Changes Nothing How Section 533 of the Income-Tax Act, 2025 Fails to Cure India&#039;s Mutual Agreement Procedure Backlog</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16540</link>
      <description>Mutual Agreement Procedure under the Income-tax Act, 2025 remains the treaty mechanism for resolving taxation not in accordance with a double taxation avoidance agreement, but Section 533 largely reproduces the earlier framework without curing India&#039;s prolonged MAP backlog. Rule 121 and Form 55 improve the application stage through more structured disclosures, yet they do not address the negotiation bottleneck, under-resourced administration, lack of mandatory arbitration, parallel domestic appeal proceedings, or limited transparency. The article proposes targeted reforms including a 24-month resolution timeline, MAP-appeal coordination, specialist resourcing, and public statistics.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>