<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Do India&#039;s 90-Plus DTAA Notifications Survive the ITA 2025 Repeal? The Section 536(2)(b) Savings Clause, CBDT Circular 789/2000&#039;s Post-Repeal Status, Form 10F Form 41 Migration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16538</link>
    <description>The transitional issue is whether DTAA notifications issued under Section 90(1) of the repealed Income-tax Act, 1961 continue as notifications under Section 4(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The article treats the notification as the domestic legal conduit for treaty enforceability, notes the savings clause and General Clauses Act continuity argument, and concludes that existing notifications are best read as carried forward under the new Act, though residual litigation risk remains absent CBDT clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Do India&#039;s 90-Plus DTAA Notifications Survive the ITA 2025 Repeal? The Section 536(2)(b) Savings Clause, CBDT Circular 789/2000&#039;s Post-Repeal Status, Form 10F Form 41 Migration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16538</link>
      <description>The transitional issue is whether DTAA notifications issued under Section 90(1) of the repealed Income-tax Act, 1961 continue as notifications under Section 4(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The article treats the notification as the domestic legal conduit for treaty enforceability, notes the savings clause and General Clauses Act continuity argument, and concludes that existing notifications are best read as carried forward under the new Act, though residual litigation risk remains absent CBDT clarification.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:32:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>