<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Collector was not valid in law. Consequently, the orders of confiscation, penalties, and assessments were set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to jurisdictional boundaries in customs assessments and confiscations, directing the evaluation of Bills of Entry pending assessment by the proper officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 145 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the show cause notice issued by the Assistant Collector was not valid in law. Consequently, the orders of confiscation, penalties, and assessments were set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to jurisdictional boundaries in customs assessments and confiscations, directing the evaluation of Bills of Entry pending assessment by the proper officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>