<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Availability of RoDTEP Benefit on Export of Restricted Sugar: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Exporters&#039; Entitlement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16530</link>
    <description>Export incentive under the RoDTEP Scheme cannot be denied merely because the exported goods were subject to a regulatory restriction, where the exports were nevertheless permitted under a quota-based or approval-based mechanism. White refined sugar exports made pursuant to permissions granted by the competent authority were treated as lawful regulated exports, not as prohibited exports, and the mere classification of sugar as restricted under the Foreign Trade Policy did not by itself disentitle exporters from RoDTEP benefits. The discussion distinguishes restricted goods from prohibited goods and states that exporters complying with permissions and statutory conditions cannot be denied benefits unless there is an express exclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:31:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 11:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Availability of RoDTEP Benefit on Export of Restricted Sugar: Bombay High Court Reaffirms Exporters&#039; Entitlement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16530</link>
      <description>Export incentive under the RoDTEP Scheme cannot be denied merely because the exported goods were subject to a regulatory restriction, where the exports were nevertheless permitted under a quota-based or approval-based mechanism. White refined sugar exports made pursuant to permissions granted by the competent authority were treated as lawful regulated exports, not as prohibited exports, and the mere classification of sugar as restricted under the Foreign Trade Policy did not by itself disentitle exporters from RoDTEP benefits. The discussion distinguishes restricted goods from prohibited goods and states that exporters complying with permissions and statutory conditions cannot be denied benefits unless there is an express exclusion.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:31:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>