https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792530 The Tribunal's treatment of three disputed purchasing dealers required fresh consideration because verification material indicated that their registrations were valid on the transaction dates and that Form C had been issued. As no finding had yet been recorded on the existence and validity of those registrations at the relevant time, and the validity of Form C also remained unresolved, further examination was necessary. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider that part of the matter afresh. en-us Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792530 The Tribunal's treatment of three disputed purchasing dealers required fresh consideration because verification material indicated that their registrations were valid on the transaction dates and that Form C had been issued. As no finding had yet been recorded on the existence and validity of those registrations at the relevant time, and the validity of Form C also remained unresolved, further examination was necessary. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider that part of the matter afresh. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792530