<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51983</link>
    <description>Refund of a bank guarantee furnished as security in provisional assessment accrues when the underlying demand is set aside, so limitation cannot be counted from the earlier date of encashment; the refund is therefore not time-barred and the security amount is refundable. Because the amount was a security deposit and not a duty payment, Section 11B was held inapplicable in this context, and the statutory basis for interest under Section 11BB was also absent; interest on the refunded amount was accordingly denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51983</link>
      <description>Refund of a bank guarantee furnished as security in provisional assessment accrues when the underlying demand is set aside, so limitation cannot be counted from the earlier date of encashment; the refund is therefore not time-barred and the security amount is refundable. Because the amount was a security deposit and not a duty payment, Section 11B was held inapplicable in this context, and the statutory basis for interest under Section 11BB was also absent; interest on the refunded amount was accordingly denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>