https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543 The extraordinary general meeting could proceed because the corporate shareholder's voting authority, the validity of a later board resolution, and the effect of the articles of association had not been finally determined. As wider disputes remained pending in the main company petition, the meeting's proposed resolutions for removal of directors could not be implemented pending that petition's disposal. The protective relief therefore preserved the subject matter without restraining the meeting itself, by keeping implementation of its resolutions in abeyance. en-us Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543 The extraordinary general meeting could proceed because the corporate shareholder's voting authority, the validity of a later board resolution, and the effect of the articles of association had not been finally determined. As wider disputes remained pending in the main company petition, the meeting's proposed resolutions for removal of directors could not be implemented pending that petition's disposal. The protective relief therefore preserved the subject matter without restraining the meeting itself, by keeping implementation of its resolutions in abeyance. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543