https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543 The NCLAT declined to restrain the extraordinary general meeting itself, as the voting authority of the corporate shareholder, the later board resolution, and the effect of the articles of association had not been finally adjudicated in the tribunal below. It held that the wider disputes were still pending in the main company petition and therefore did not warrant final determination in the appeal. To preserve the subject matter, the tribunal kept the implementation of any resolution passed at the meeting in abeyance until disposal of the main petition. en-us Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543 The NCLAT declined to restrain the extraordinary general meeting itself, as the voting authority of the corporate shareholder, the later board resolution, and the effect of the articles of association had not been finally adjudicated in the tribunal below. It held that the wider disputes were still pending in the main company petition and therefore did not warrant final determination in the appeal. To preserve the subject matter, the tribunal kept the implementation of any resolution passed at the meeting in abeyance until disposal of the main petition. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792543