<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1757 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792554</link>
    <description>An addition under section 69A for opening cash-in-hand was deleted because the assessee gave a plausible explanation that the cash represented withdrawals accumulated from income already offered to tax. The earlier omission of the cash balance in a return did not, by itself, make the later opening balance unexplained. Substantial earlier returned income supported the assessee&#039;s financial capacity, while the Revenue relied mainly on presumptions such as the absence of contemporaneous cash expenses, low demonetisation deposits, and non-production of a cash book at assessment. On the record, the assessee discharged the onus and the addition was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1757 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792554</link>
      <description>An addition under section 69A for opening cash-in-hand was deleted because the assessee gave a plausible explanation that the cash represented withdrawals accumulated from income already offered to tax. The earlier omission of the cash balance in a return did not, by itself, make the later opening balance unexplained. Substantial earlier returned income supported the assessee&#039;s financial capacity, while the Revenue relied mainly on presumptions such as the absence of contemporaneous cash expenses, low demonetisation deposits, and non-production of a cash book at assessment. On the record, the assessee discharged the onus and the addition was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>