<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1790 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792587</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment was discussed in the context of &quot;reasons to believe&quot;, a survey under section 133A, and alleged business income attributable to a dependent agent permanent establishment and a fixed place permanent establishment. The note also refers to the need for tangible material supporting the belief and reliance on precedent. The Supreme Court text records that it found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order, leaving the High Court decision undisturbed on the materials presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1790 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792587</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment was discussed in the context of &quot;reasons to believe&quot;, a survey under section 133A, and alleged business income attributable to a dependent agent permanent establishment and a fixed place permanent establishment. The note also refers to the need for tangible material supporting the belief and reliance on precedent. The Supreme Court text records that it found no good ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order, leaving the High Court decision undisturbed on the materials presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>