<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 142 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51977</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the appeal regarding denial of Modvat credit on exported medicament. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the product was patent and proprietary, as the monogram on the container was only a house mark. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was upheld based on the Supreme Court judgment in Astra Pharmaceuticals v. CCE. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 142 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51977</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the appeal regarding denial of Modvat credit on exported medicament. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the product was patent and proprietary, as the monogram on the container was only a house mark. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was upheld based on the Supreme Court judgment in Astra Pharmaceuticals v. CCE. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>