https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792595 A writ court will ordinarily not interfere under Article 226 against a notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act where the dispute turns on fact-intensive questions such as the genuineness of suppliers, the movement and receipt of goods, and the evidentiary value of invoices, e-way bills and bank payments; the challenge at the notice stage was therefore not accepted. The adjudication was left to proceed, with direction that all relied upon documents be furnished and that the petitioner be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the authority must act strictly in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792595 A writ court will ordinarily not interfere under Article 226 against a notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act where the dispute turns on fact-intensive questions such as the genuineness of suppliers, the movement and receipt of goods, and the evidentiary value of invoices, e-way bills and bank payments; the challenge at the notice stage was therefore not accepted. The adjudication was left to proceed, with direction that all relied upon documents be furnished and that the petitioner be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and the authority must act strictly in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792595