<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1802 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792599</link>
    <description>Section 125 of the GST Act permits a maximum penalty of Rs. 25,000, so separate penalties of Rs. 25,000 under CGST and Rs. 25,000 under SGST exceeded the statutory limit and could not be sustained. Because the original penalty order was contrary to the statute, the appellate order dismissing the challenge as time-barred could not stand independently and was also set aside. The matter was remanded to the authority for a fresh order in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1802 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792599</link>
      <description>Section 125 of the GST Act permits a maximum penalty of Rs. 25,000, so separate penalties of Rs. 25,000 under CGST and Rs. 25,000 under SGST exceeded the statutory limit and could not be sustained. Because the original penalty order was contrary to the statute, the appellate order dismissing the challenge as time-barred could not stand independently and was also set aside. The matter was remanded to the authority for a fresh order in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>