<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1805 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792602</link>
    <description>Failure to show due supply of the grounds of arrest and connected arrest documents rendered the arrest unlawful, because the arrest memo did not indicate annexure or separate service of those documents and the record lacked a distinct DIN on the grounds of arrest. The remand order was also held mechanical and passed without application of mind, as it relied only on a general allegation of a serious economic offence and did not examine whether the arrest documents had been served. The detention was therefore quashed, habeas corpus relief was held maintainable, and release from custody was directed forthwith, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1805 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792602</link>
      <description>Failure to show due supply of the grounds of arrest and connected arrest documents rendered the arrest unlawful, because the arrest memo did not indicate annexure or separate service of those documents and the record lacked a distinct DIN on the grounds of arrest. The remand order was also held mechanical and passed without application of mind, as it relied only on a general allegation of a serious economic offence and did not examine whether the arrest documents had been served. The detention was therefore quashed, habeas corpus relief was held maintainable, and release from custody was directed forthwith, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>