<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1806 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792603</link>
    <description>After constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal, the writ petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Tribunal. The appeal was to be filed within the period specified by the HC order and, if filed within that time, was to be entertained without limitation objection. The amount already deposited pursuant to the writ proceedings was to be treated as compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement on production of the necessary proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1806 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792603</link>
      <description>After constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal, the writ petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Tribunal. The appeal was to be filed within the period specified by the HC order and, if filed within that time, was to be entertained without limitation objection. The amount already deposited pursuant to the writ proceedings was to be treated as compliance with the statutory pre-deposit requirement on production of the necessary proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>