<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1808 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792605</link>
    <description>Section 130 of the GST Act cannot be invoked solely because excess stock is found during a survey. The Court applied the settled position that, where the only basis for action is excess stock noticed in investigation, the authorities exceed the jurisdiction conferred by law. On those facts, the orders fastening tax liability and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1808 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792605</link>
      <description>Section 130 of the GST Act cannot be invoked solely because excess stock is found during a survey. The Court applied the settled position that, where the only basis for action is excess stock noticed in investigation, the authorities exceed the jurisdiction conferred by law. On those facts, the orders fastening tax liability and penalty were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>