<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1817 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792614</link>
    <description>An assessment order taxing the petitioner for July 2017 to March 2023 was held unsustainable where the same factual basis had already led to refund orders for other periods and earlier adverse assessments had been overturned in appeal. The court found no distinguishing factual or legal basis to justify a different treatment for the impugned period, and treated the assessment as discriminatory. The assessment order dated 29.11.2024 was quashed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1817 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792614</link>
      <description>An assessment order taxing the petitioner for July 2017 to March 2023 was held unsustainable where the same factual basis had already led to refund orders for other periods and earlier adverse assessments had been overturned in appeal. The court found no distinguishing factual or legal basis to justify a different treatment for the impugned period, and treated the assessment as discriminatory. The assessment order dated 29.11.2024 was quashed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>