<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi HC rejects Pernod Ricard&#039;s plea against denial of L1 liquor licence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73066</link>
    <description>Wholesale liquor supply L-1 licence was denied on the basis of a pending money laundering prosecution. The challenge argued that, without conviction, there was no criminal background for licence denial under the Delhi Excise Act, and that discharge in the scheduled offence undermined the PMLA case. The High Court declined to interfere with the refusal and treated the pending prosecution as relevant to the licence applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 21:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 21:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi HC rejects Pernod Ricard&#039;s plea against denial of L1 liquor licence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73066</link>
      <description>Wholesale liquor supply L-1 licence was denied on the basis of a pending money laundering prosecution. The challenge argued that, without conviction, there was no criminal background for licence denial under the Delhi Excise Act, and that discharge in the scheduled offence undermined the PMLA case. The High Court declined to interfere with the refusal and treated the pending prosecution as relevant to the licence applications.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 21:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>