<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1765 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469024</link>
    <description>An adverse adjudication order under the GST regime cannot stand where the noticee is denied a proper personal hearing, as that breaches the principles of natural justice. The availability of an alternative remedy does not cure the defect when the hearing requirement has not been satisfied. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority to permit a fresh reply, grant a hearing, and pass a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 19:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1765 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469024</link>
      <description>An adverse adjudication order under the GST regime cannot stand where the noticee is denied a proper personal hearing, as that breaches the principles of natural justice. The availability of an alternative remedy does not cure the defect when the hearing requirement has not been satisfied. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority to permit a fresh reply, grant a hearing, and pass a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>