<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 124 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51967</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai clarified errors in the stay order. The appellant withdrew the part of the application related to a demand for payment of Rs. 84.21 lakhs under Rule 57CC. The application for waiver of deposit of duty was not pressed. The sum referred to was in the context of the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 124 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51967</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai clarified errors in the stay order. The appellant withdrew the part of the application related to a demand for payment of Rs. 84.21 lakhs under Rule 57CC. The application for waiver of deposit of duty was not pressed. The sum referred to was in the context of the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>