<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51966</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules was held not sustainable where the duty had already been debited before issuance of the show cause notice. The Tribunal applied settled precedent to the facts and treated prior payment of duty, made soon after the lapse was pointed out, as removing the basis for penal action. On that footing, the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:13:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 173 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51966</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules was held not sustainable where the duty had already been debited before issuance of the show cause notice. The Tribunal applied settled precedent to the facts and treated prior payment of duty, made soon after the lapse was pointed out, as removing the basis for penal action. On that footing, the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>