<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1666 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792463</link>
    <description>Service tax demand based solely on income-tax return data, profit and loss account and balance sheet was held unsustainable where the department made no independent enquiry to verify the discrepancy or establish suppression. As the show cause notice for the relevant year was issued beyond the normal limitation period, invocation of the extended period of limitation failed. The demand and the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1666 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792463</link>
      <description>Service tax demand based solely on income-tax return data, profit and loss account and balance sheet was held unsustainable where the department made no independent enquiry to verify the discrepancy or establish suppression. As the show cause notice for the relevant year was issued beyond the normal limitation period, invocation of the extended period of limitation failed. The demand and the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>