https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51960 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside the demands for clandestine removal due to insufficient evidence. The appellant's reliance on private chits and admissions was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, such as purchase of inputs and excess power consumption, to substantiate claims of clandestine activities. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51960 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside the demands for clandestine removal due to insufficient evidence. The appellant's reliance on private chits and admissions was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, such as purchase of inputs and excess power consumption, to substantiate claims of clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51960