<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1693 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792490</link>
    <description>Intra-group service recoveries were held not to be fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Netherlands tax treaty because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian recipient for independent future use. The Tribunal also treated surcharge and education cess as not leviable over and above the treaty rate on royalty or fees for technical services, considering the treaty rate a composite ceiling. A separate reimbursement or cost-allocation characterisation was rejected on the facts. Substantive treaty-based non-taxability was accepted for the service receipts, while computational matters were remanded for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1693 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792490</link>
      <description>Intra-group service recoveries were held not to be fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Netherlands tax treaty because the services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to the Indian recipient for independent future use. The Tribunal also treated surcharge and education cess as not leviable over and above the treaty rate on royalty or fees for technical services, considering the treaty rate a composite ceiling. A separate reimbursement or cost-allocation characterisation was rejected on the facts. Substantive treaty-based non-taxability was accepted for the service receipts, while computational matters were remanded for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>